61
The free fediverses should focus on consent (including consent-based federation), privacy, and safety (privacy.thenexus.today)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
50 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Ok, I may have blown the discussion a bit out of proposition earlier. It's just that I thought you meant basically the whole Fediverse. The name "Free Fediverse" is a bit misleading imo.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 years ago (4 children)

    Yeah, one of my takeaways is that I should have been clearer that this isn't a proposal for the whole fediverse. And not sure what the best term to use is, "free fediverses" is what I'm going with for now (based on the freefediverse.org).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Free fediverse(s) makes sense, building on top of that already floating term sounds sensible

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    How about this as a revised first sentence to clarify the focus is on an alternative (not the whole fediverse)?

    As I discuss in the first post in the series, the "free fediverses" are regions of the fediverse that reject Meta and surveillance capitalism, and these strategies position the free fediverses as an alternative to Threads and "Meta's fediverses".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •