111
Study shows AI image-generators being trained on explicit photos of children (www.independent.co.uk)
submitted 2 years ago by [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Study shows AI image-generators being trained on explicit photos of children::Hidden inside the foundation of popular artificial intelligence image-generators are thousands of images of child sexual abuse, according to a new report that urges companies to take action to address a harmful flaw in the technology they built

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Did you just compare furries to pedophiles? One of those is harmless, the other is not.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Ironically, I was giving them as an example of something OK. My point just went over your head.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [+] -6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    No, it didn't but it seems like mine went over yours. Furries usually are fine outside a few bad actors but pedophiles are mentally ill and should not be allowed them to generate AI CSAM just to satisfy them. They should be seeking help, not jerking it to fake kiddies.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    People used to say trans people were mentally ill. If they're not harming actual children, what's it to you what their fetish is?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Stop trying to justify your mental illness. You need to seek help if you think fucking kids is okay.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago

    I don't think that. Obviously actually having sex with children is wrong. I was saying that generating AI child porn with no actual harm to children involved can't be logically argued to be immoral.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)
    [removed by mod]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    And there it is. Your problem is you equate furries to pedophiles because you think furries are into bestiality. Thanks for proving you're an idiot.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •