you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 21 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Hopefully the Supreme Court of Corruption doesn't fuck this up.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    This is the Wisconsin Supreme Court, not the U.S. Supreme Court. And it has a liberal majority, which is why they ordered new maps.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    GOP is appealing to the US SC the article says.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Last time this happened they said they don't interfere in state election law. Surely they wouldn't change their minds now that it's a liberal state SC ruling would they...?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Last time this happened they said they don’t interfere in state election law.

    Because I'm curious, what case was that? I'd really like to read it over and see how the concepts could apply to the Section Three ruling that came out of Colorado and will most certainly be appealed to SCOTUS.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment