warning: seriously nasty narcissism at length

archive: https://archive.is/eoXQj

this is a response to the post discussed in: https://awful.systems/post/220620

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 2 years ago

Fair, and putting it through my Bayesian calculations I think the chance of it having any type of proofreader is only 11.111% (repeating of course)

  • source
  • parent