you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago (6 children)

Not at all. I just assumed you understood the basics of quality.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    you never mentioned 'quality' until you wanted to disqualify data that didn't support your position.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago* (4 children)

    Yes, because there is a basic assumption. Those projects aren't consumer-facing games. Those are hobbies. You know it and you are simply arguing in bad faith. I know actual game developers who released their games for free or under a pay-what-you-want model. They refuse to do so again because they can't support themselves by doing it. I am a game developer and I won't release my games for free because I need to support myself. There is all the data you need. Find me other data saying otherwise.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I know actual game developers who released their games for free or under a pay-what-you-want model. They refuse to do so again because they can’t support themselves by doing it. I am a game developer and I won’t release my games for free because I need to support myself. There is all the data you need.

    the plural of "anecdote" is not "data"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments