1276
Google admits it's making YouTube worse for ad block users (www.theregister.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
312 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (11 children)
[deleted]
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    You are correct. Fundamentally, it's the hosting and storage issue that's the crux of all this.

    And the only choices available are another corporation hosting and paying/passing on the cost, or all of us hosting on a peer-to-peer network, which will be slow, but doable.

    Having said that, the peer hosting method would work though, and shouldn't be dismissed out of hand. We just shouldn't expect the same level of service we do from YouTube or any corporation hosting videos.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I mean torrenting works but i'll be damned if I'd need to wait for the buffer to fill up every 30sec for the 1440p video.
    You'd need multiple versions pre-encoded to reduce network transfer and serverside transcoding.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    I mean torrenting works but i’ll be damned if I’d need to wait for the buffer to fill up every 30sec for the 1440p video. You’d need multiple versions pre-encoded to reduce network transfer and serverside transcoding.

    It would definately be a slog to watch, vs a service that can just deliver the video to you in real time on demand.

    My only point is that you would be able to watch the video, after the slog, so that avenue should not be discounted as an option. Its not a great option, but still, an option.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Peertube is already just as good in terms of performance, it does need more content and better discoverability for sure

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    Peertube is already just as good in terms of performance

    I don't think you can judge performance in an 'apple versus oranges' (pop usage) scenario though.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    They are using known tech, they did not reinvent the wheel

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    They are using known tech, they did not reinvent the wheel

    That's not my point though. My point is how much capacity versus how many people are using the service.

    You're trying to equate the same level of capacity when there's different levels of usage.

    Finally, how you implement the tech is as important as the tech itself, as it can be done either well, or poorly.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent