RPGMemes

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 14 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

If you let players take too many long rests in DND 5e it fucks over short-rest and no-rest classes. Long rest people get more Fun Stuff than everyone else. Feels bad.

Edit: also it does weird things to the story pacing. Any time sensitivity gets weird if the players are going a five minute adventuring day

parent

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 point 2 years ago

So you say they can only benefit from a long rest each 24 hours.

They can try to long rest, but they will get an encounter and no benefit from resting.

parent

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

For my group I have them make sure to secure the area as their rest may get interrupted if they don't

But I also roll on a relevant encounter table when they do and add a modifier based on the groups checks for it being secure (usually a survival check, so usually it's the ranger doing the rolling for that)

Short rests are a lot easier though

parent

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

Random encounters aren't the most interesting thing to do at the table for most people. Design choices that funnel the play time into them then seems like a poor idea.

If you're playing the game just for the combat itself then it's probably fine. But if you're playing for any sort of story then fighting a random pack of spiders probably pays off less than fighting plot relevant stuff.

parent

[–] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

That's my secret really, the players never see my random encounter tables. They roll the dice but they don't see the table.

They include a lot of stuff relevant to what's going on more than "random spiders"

A good example is when they were trying to locate an old run down keep that a local band of bandits were using as a hideout. The random encounter table included such things as: group of bandits on their way back after a raid (successful, not, injured, not, etc), group of recent hostages on their way to freedom (escaped, released, escorted, etc), a caravan being raided nearby by the bandits in question (or others), rival bandits on the same mission, etc. A couple entries are (of course) night passes peacefully and usually there's 1 or 2 creature encounters (that can usually be avoided), and hell even a "sounds in the distance (insert kind of sound based on perception check(this may lead back to the earlier table))". And even some stuff that may lead to new adventures.

It's more work than just "creatures roll initiative" but IMO is way more rewarding, and my players seem to enjoy it a lot.

Random encounter tables is a vague term but unfortunately I think may be the correct one in this case.

parent

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah it sounds like your "random tables" still hook into the story there. That's not the "random encounter" I was thinking of exactly. I was thinking more of the "You're traveling through the woods when you encounter... four spiders and a dire badger!" Those tend to be kind of shallow.

Personally I prefer to come up with scenarios and not roll on a table at all. Like, instead of thinking about "the bandits came back successfully" and also "they came back injured" I can just pick one and bake it more.

But this is kind of drifting off the topic I was trying to describe. I was objecting to the "Well we need 4-8 medium encounters for the game's assumptions to hold, so I guess you're fighting some random bears now" thing. Doing encounters just to wear down the party's resources is a weird design in my mind.