you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

The world got essentially all classical music, the painting on the ceiling of the Sistine chapel, etc. without the need for copyright. Shakespeare's work wasn't protected by copyrights either. So, it's not like amazing works of art require copyright. They'll happen regardless. It's more about how artists are incentivized to create and who profits.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [โ€“] 1 point 2 years ago*

    Bonus point: they will be about passion, not the money.

    Not saying money shouldn't be there - we need to support free creators so they could make a living and pursue their passion - but copyright is too often not about that in particular, being owned often not by the authors and squeezing everything if the creation gets popular.

  • source
  • parent