▲ 879 ▼ Names (lemmy.ca) submitted 2 years ago by dullbananas@lemmy.ca to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml 237 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Scrof@sopuli.xyz 133 points 2 years ago (7 children) And killing children. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 98 points 2 years ago (1 child) Master/slave systems are probably a-ok for them though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] 30p87@feddit.de 34 points 2 years ago The only reason killing children is bad in their view would be if the child is unborn/not spawned already or if they want to abuse it but can't anymore. permalink fedilink source parent [+] velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 2 years ago That's actually sacred. permalink fedilink source parent [–] holycrap@lemm.ee 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) They'd probably be fine with that as long as they're not unborn permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Would deleting an executable file without running it be equivalent to an abortion? Or is it more like contraception? Either way some religions ban both of those permalink fedilink source parent [–] far_university1990@feddit.de 20 points 2 years ago And detaching/reattaching git heads. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 98 points 2 years ago (1 child) Master/slave systems are probably a-ok for them though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] 30p87@feddit.de 34 points 2 years ago The only reason killing children is bad in their view would be if the child is unborn/not spawned already or if they want to abuse it but can't anymore. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 30p87@feddit.de 34 points 2 years ago The only reason killing children is bad in their view would be if the child is unborn/not spawned already or if they want to abuse it but can't anymore. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] velox_vulnus@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 2 years ago That's actually sacred. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 2 years ago That's actually sacred. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] holycrap@lemm.ee 23 points 2 years ago (1 child) They'd probably be fine with that as long as they're not unborn permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Would deleting an executable file without running it be equivalent to an abortion? Or is it more like contraception? Either way some religions ban both of those permalink fedilink source parent
[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Would deleting an executable file without running it be equivalent to an abortion? Or is it more like contraception? Either way some religions ban both of those permalink fedilink source parent
[–] far_university1990@feddit.de 20 points 2 years ago And detaching/reattaching git heads. permalink fedilink source parent
