710
Behold The Hyundai Uni Wheel. Transportation May Never Be The Same (cleantechnica.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
254 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 41 points 2 years ago (7 children)

I'd be concerned with the amount of unsprung weight this adds, too. You're basically taking the transmission and adding that mass to the hub. Seems like it would be pretty crashy on rough surfaces.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    I considered that but couldn't make any conclusions. The driveshaft and sun gear are not added to the unsprung. I'd guess only half the weight of planets and carriers is added. It definitely adds the weight of the ring gear to the unsprung mass.

    I'm also curious how this affects rotational mass. So while every component spinning with the wheel from tire to motor shaft has rotational inertia, small-diameter components such as drive shafts have relatively little rotational inertia. Wheels and even brake discs have a lot more. I don't have numbers obviously but I'm curious if the rotational mass of the ring gear ends up being detrimental compared to a heavier-weight lower-inertia cv setup.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Isn't the ring gear the wheel body (or whatever it's called), that is, even a fixed axle would have weight there, the gearteeth even provide stiffness. CV joints also contain unsprung mass, I'd say there might be a bit of a difference but nothing drastic. With modern fancy biomimetic wheel body geometries and everything you'll probably definitely be lighter than 80s steel rims. What happened to spoked wheels, anyway.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    The CV only contributes half it's mass to unsprung weight, and this system still requires a drive shaft and either a CV or u-joint. But with more mass at the hub.

    Typical hubs are still lighter than this, because this setup still requires the hub structure, it's just adding gearing out there.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Half of the hub is unsprung, the transition between sprung and unsprung is at those fancy articulating planetary gears. The drive shaft is definitely sprung, it and the motor is completely static relative to the battery and everything.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    Yep.

    Trucks used these as far back as pre-WWII. It a great solution for off road vehicles to gain clearance. At low speeds, even universal joints work fine for this setup, because the shaft rotates at 1/3 wheel speed, like a drives haft does going into a differential.

    This puts a diff at each wheel.

    Edit: These are called Portal Gears

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Not quite portal gears, that has the input shaft fixed at the top. This is like an adjustable portal gear.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Meh, it's still a portal hub, where you put the input shaft is a minor difference. It's still putting the gearset in the hub, increasing the total weight of the vehicle, and increasing unsprung weight.

    Calling it a new thing is a lie. All they've done is switch it to planetary gears. I'd bet lots of money this was tried a long time ago, and was shelved in favor of an offset input shaft.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent