you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 2 years ago (16 children)

Bail was literally devised as a means to keep wealthy people out of prison while putting undo burden on working class people charged with the same crime. 100,000 dollars isn't realistic for most people to have available, but wealthy criminals can toss that out like cab fare

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    Yes, there are issues with the bail system. Although, it's not usually 200k.

    But that's not the point. The point is that he's going through the process, and we shouldn't just jail political figures without due process. It's crazy to me how many people can't understand that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The point is he should be getting the same treatment as anyone else who was being charged as he was. Nobody would be seeing the outside of a courtroom or jail cell with the series of charges against him.

    This has nothing to do with how unlikeable he is or his political affiliations. This has everything to do with evidence pointing to him committing a series of crimes. Why should he get to run around free when others in his position would not?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Maybe maybe not. Nobody's been in this position before. But I'm sure he would agree with you lot, ignore the process, and jail his opponents.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    His attempts to threaten witnesses, lawyers and even the judges involved in his cases alone would get any regular person behind bars, to say nothing of his refusal to stop and other bad faith arguments to fight gag orders

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    It's crazy to me how you can't understand how corruption works

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (9 children)

    You think it's corrupt justice departments pressing charges in multiple states and federally?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (8 children)

    I think it's corrupt justice departments keeping him eligible for higher office.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    No, that would be the constitution. He can run from prison if he wants.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago* (6 children)

    The "Constitution" is no fucking excuse. All kinds of laws and rulings have nothing to do with the fucking Constitution. That is now only the kast refuge for assholes and losers. And if anything, the Constitution says he is guilty of High Treason. And this SCOTUS is no longer capable of interpreting the Constitution.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    The only requirement in the Constitution is that a candidate be 35, a resident for 14 years, and a natural born citizen. It is an "excuse" because that's the law, not a LAsT REfuGe for doo doo heads.

    You said that the corrupt justice department was trying to keep him eligible. That's ridiculous on its face because they aren't helping with his eligibility at all.

    Tin foil hat shit.

    Hilariously, you're wrong about high treason, too. But you can look that one up yourself.

    I happen to think trump is a treasonous piece of shit but laws matter, and they matter because of people like him.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    He also cannot have been involved in treasonous acts, insurrections, or TEARGASSING CITIZENS FOR A FUCKING OHOTO OP.

    Now QUIT DEFENDING THAT MOTHERFUCKER.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I'm not defending him. You just don't know what you're talking about.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Well the Constitution doesn't say I can't slam the genitals of random strangers in a grand piano lid, so Imma get right on that because what the Constitution says is all that matters

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments