157
What is something that definitely should not exist? (endlesstalk.org)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
219 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

they are fine. except the 4th. that should have been never existed.

I know lots of people hate the sequels, but they add to the story, it's another question they are... just action movies with a little bit of early 2000s cringe.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [โ€“] 5 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Well, the 4th was a sequel to deliberately end all future sequels.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [โ€“] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

    I understand that, but this reasoning as well don't really help on it at all. ruining something nice because "fuck you all" is just... I don't even know.

    edit: I think Matrix could have been a great series, even with something main plot that the 4th one had. or a cartoon. I know lot of frenchise went downhill after taking this path, but it's something that would have fit nicely with Matrix.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [โ€“] 3 points 2 years ago

    I honestly appreciated some of the tongue in cheek self awareness of the 4th movie, but it was overall just another long series of action sequences. The first movie was a movie with mystery and a story to it beyond contrived excuses to use bullet time. The sequels are very low on substance. Not a big fan.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent