-1
Apple MacBook Pro 16 2023 M3 Pro review - Efficiency before performance (www.notebookcheck.net)
submitted 2 years ago by [B] to c/apple@hardware.watch
113 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

This is outrageous. It’s so easy to throw it on a charger while you shower. It would be great if the battery lasts longer but it’s insane to say you can’t sleep with it now.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (2 children)

    What a laughably bad excuse.

    How long are your showers? Mine are usually about 15 minutes.

    Per the US EPA the average shower is 8 Minutes

    Per Apple the watch takes 2.5 hours to charge to full. 1.5 for 80% or about .5% a minute for the first 90 minutes

    Even with my 15 minute showers I'd get a ~13% charge. That's a little of 2 hours worth of battery. Idk about you but generally I need at minimum 6, and try to shoot for 8 hours of sleep.

    To get a solid 8 hours of life you would need a ~45% charge. So anyone who wants to charge this during a shower better be taking 50 minute showers at a minimum.

    I don't think it's outrageous to suggest a company compete with on something a basic as battery life when their competitors have proven it possible for 7 years..

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    Dude. Charge it when you shower and charge it while you’re winding down before sleep. I literally do it daily. You’re claiming that what is totally easy and doable is impossible. Get a grip.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    what is totally easy and doable is impossible

    Yeah I never said it was impossible. Don't misrepresent my argument just because you can't defend yours.

    It's of course possible to charge the watch, it's just inconvenient to have to deal with multiple times a day. For 2.5 hours of not using it every day. You get less than a full days (24 hours) usage.

    You're making excuses for Apple not competing, and blaming the consumer for simply wanting a product that competes, and isn't inconvenient.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    For 2.5 hours of not using it every day

    I’ve been using an Apple Watch for several years now, and I have never drained one of them completely in that time. The routine that /u/Apollo—User suggested works great, and hardly takes the 2.5 hours you’ve claimed

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [B] 1 point 2 years ago

    I mean I charged my Series 6 either in the hour before bed or would just let it charge while on my way to work in the car. So usually I averaged about 45 minutes to an hour without it on and charging a day. It usually never got back up to 100% but it stayed within about 85% to 30% everyday with those habits. I now have an Ultra 2 and only charge it for about 45 minutes to an hour every other day.

    While it would be great to having longer battery life like Polar or Garmin or Fitbit or other dedicated sports watches the battery life of the Apple Watch doesn't prevent you from using it for sleep tracking (which from my use will at most take 10% of battery if you had a pretty restless night of sleep).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent