this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Football / Soccer / Calcio / Futebol / Fußball

142 readers
1 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (6 children)

You guys are a money-no-object club, you can absolutely afford to take the gambles and pocket the wins. United are having to budget carefully for FFP and they’ve blown a fortune on transfer fee/wages here!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

United fans and crying about money when they're just as bad, name a better combo

united just do shit business

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

United have even more money than chelsea, just chelsea sometimes actually sell players they've spunked away all their money on so they can spunk away some more money

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I assume there is a /s here lol.

We signed Silva on a free...and we also stay within FFP by selling/loaning players.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Wages still count for FFP. He’s not playing for free.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Our wage bill is smaller than City's, Arsenal's, and United's...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What part of that doesn’t mean giving a huge contract to an aging player is a risk? You seem to be arguing that it’s not a risk because he was signed on a free transfer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

We give Silva 1 year deals that he and Chelsea must agree to extend...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

You guys are a money-no-object club, you can absolutely afford to take the gambles and pocket the wins.

huh wasn't thiago silva was a free transfer though?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

United is also a money-no-object club lol. They are just bad at it

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

This has to be a copypasta