2
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)
Soccer (Closing)
157 readers
1 users here now
This community is being retired in favor of !football@soccer.forum.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
You guys are a money-no-object club, you can absolutely afford to take the gambles and pocket the wins. United are having to budget carefully for FFP and they’ve blown a fortune on transfer fee/wages here!
United fans and crying about money when they're just as bad, name a better combo
united just do shit business
United have even more money than chelsea, just chelsea sometimes actually sell players they've spunked away all their money on so they can spunk away some more money
I assume there is a /s here lol.
We signed Silva on a free...and we also stay within FFP by selling/loaning players.
Wages still count for FFP. He’s not playing for free.
Our wage bill is smaller than City's, Arsenal's, and United's...
What part of that doesn’t mean giving a huge contract to an aging player is a risk? You seem to be arguing that it’s not a risk because he was signed on a free transfer.
We give Silva 1 year deals that he and Chelsea must agree to extend...
huh wasn't thiago silva was a free transfer though?
United is also a money-no-object club lol. They are just bad at it
This has to be a copypasta