this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)

Apple

67 readers
2 users here now

A place for Apple news, rumors, and discussions.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Where did you see this? Again, last rumors I saw indicated there were considering cloud-based solutions, as well as hybrid and on-device.

You seem to have a very selective habit when you read on what your read. I state "up till now" and "until recently", read more carefully next time.
Also on every announcement they made for Siri, AI on device on their presentations etc.

Where are you getting your numbers from?

You can obviously google for past interviews/news, similar to any other company investment, but in the first 5 seconds I found this
https://www.businessinsider.com/tim-cook-apples-ai-research-spend-generative-2023-8

But you don't see them making sanctimonious proclamations about what others should do

You are joking , yes? MS, Google , Meta, Samsung, Intel etc did not made any statements on especially Apple?
are you living under a stone or something?

> Apple hates regulation.

All big companies will try to avoid regulations if they can benefit from it, again since you seem to be blind for others, Google, Amazon, MS, Meta, VW , the list goes on. They will only bring up regulation when it is towards their interest.

See their ongoing fight with the EU et al.

I am going to need a coupe of hours to expand on that, but again same as every other company.see above, especially when they invested money on it

And they're happy to ignore the work of standards bodies whenever they please. If Apple wants regulation, they really want Apple-defined regulation.

And again, EVERY company will try to avoid the rules or regulations if the can benefit from it and will only revert to those when it suits them best. Apple, Google, MS, Meta, VW, the list goes on

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You seem to have a very selective habit when you read on what your read. I state "up till now" and "until recently", read more carefully next time.

You were making claims about what they were researching, not what they've released. These are not the same thing. And your sentence was a gramatical mess, do maybe consider writing more clearly?

You can obviously google for past interviews/news, similar to any other company investment, but in the first 5 seconds I found this

Your claim was that Apple invests as much as anyone else in AI. There's nothing in that link to suggest that statement is true. So am I to presume you just made it up?

You are joking , yes? MS, Google , Meta, Samsung, Intel etc did not made any statements on especially Apple? are you living under a stone or something?

Sure. Please find where those companies suggested regulation in a field they don't participate in. Much less AI-specific.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

You were making claims about what they were researching, not what they've released. These are not the same thing. And your sentence was a gramatical mess, do maybe consider writing more clearly?

I was writing as to what they were researching which also included what they released. Research does not happen overnight genius .
My sentence is more than fine, maybe you need to learn to read.

Your claim was that Apple invests as much as anyone else in AI. There's nothing in that link to suggest that statement is true. So am I to presume you just made it up?

either read the article again or learn to do a 5 minute google search. The only made up here is that you refuse to accept that you are not correct

Sure. Please find where those companies suggested regulation in a field they don't participate in. Much less AI-specific.

messaging, USB/connectors, CPU chips, countless and countless lawsuits between each other, App stores, and the list goes on.