▲ 1785 ▼ This might help explain the spectacular launch of Threads (lemmy.world) submitted 3 years ago by MusketeerX@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world 262 comments fedilink hide all child comments Automatically creating a shadow account for everyone on Instagram? Even allowing people to follow that account? Sounds like they really wanted to push Threads out the door in a big way.
[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 5 points 3 years ago (3 children) I think you have nailed the reason they have not done this. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] johnthebeboptist@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) I guarantee you that's not the reason. They did/do similar shit with Facebook and people were pissed, now anyone barely remembers or cares. People don't care and facwbook/meta/zuck certainly doesn't. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago Things are more complicated than that. Spinning off of facebook was necessary. Just because you've done something once doesn't mean you do the same thing in similar-but-not-identical situations though. It's all calculation at the end of the day, and each equation has its own set of variables. Similar to how we're likely going to see a brand new form of attack, where instead of being EEE'd, he just tries to smother awareness of us and keep us small. Since he can't actually outright eliminate us. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Niello@kbin.social 4 points 3 years ago And because WhatsApp isn't popular throughout since there are also regions that almost exclusively use LINE or very heavily adopted Telegram. Not everyone uses Instagram but it's a popular choice for the kind of service it offers all over the world. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] johnthebeboptist@lemmy.world 9 points 3 years ago (1 child) I guarantee you that's not the reason. They did/do similar shit with Facebook and people were pissed, now anyone barely remembers or cares. People don't care and facwbook/meta/zuck certainly doesn't. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago Things are more complicated than that. Spinning off of facebook was necessary. Just because you've done something once doesn't mean you do the same thing in similar-but-not-identical situations though. It's all calculation at the end of the day, and each equation has its own set of variables. Similar to how we're likely going to see a brand new form of attack, where instead of being EEE'd, he just tries to smother awareness of us and keep us small. Since he can't actually outright eliminate us. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Candelestine@lemmy.world 6 points 3 years ago Things are more complicated than that. Spinning off of facebook was necessary. Just because you've done something once doesn't mean you do the same thing in similar-but-not-identical situations though. It's all calculation at the end of the day, and each equation has its own set of variables. Similar to how we're likely going to see a brand new form of attack, where instead of being EEE'd, he just tries to smother awareness of us and keep us small. Since he can't actually outright eliminate us. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Niello@kbin.social 4 points 3 years ago And because WhatsApp isn't popular throughout since there are also regions that almost exclusively use LINE or very heavily adopted Telegram. Not everyone uses Instagram but it's a popular choice for the kind of service it offers all over the world. permalink fedilink source parent