you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 31 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Ah, more of the liberalism. You know there's structural racism, you know it is fundamentally different from this "prejudice based on skin color" nonsense, you know that people are not aware enough of that ignorance and like a liberal counterrevolutionary, you argue in favor of keeping them ignorant on this. Why? How fragile do you have to be to get insulted over the term cracker? I'm white myself, i've never felt the slightest bit insulted by the word. And unlike your privileged ass, i know what actual oppression is, what it means to be targeted by actual slurs. Your position is laughable and reactionary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    you argue in favor of keeping them ignorant on this

    Here's what I actually said:

    If some chud tries to equate cracker with the n-word that's a fight worth having: persuadable people instinctively know we're right and you can educate people by explaining why.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Yes, and after that you have spent several posts arguing why we should do the exact opposite and value the misleading idea that cracker is in some way comparable to the nword, you disingenuous debatebro weasel.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    value the misleading idea that cracker is in some way comparable to the nword

    If some chud tries to equate cracker with the n-word that's a fight worth having

    jesse-wtf

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago

    You continue to argue in bad faith like the cahuvinist redditor turd gourmet you are, quoting the one paragraph ITT where you werne't completely full of shit and pretending you didn't type out the entire rest of your replies.

  • source
  • parent