242
Elon Musk’s SpaceX rocket explodes in second test flight | CNN (www.cnn.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
106 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

SpaceX’s Starship rocket system reached several milestones in its second test flight before the rocket booster and spacecraft exploded over the Gulf of Mexico.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The space shuttle was a bus on boosters we had to fish out of the ocean. It was expensive and had a very limited cargo capacity.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] -2 points 2 years ago

    Okay?

    I mean, I very much forget what the "marketing" was. But like I mentioned above, the real value is the crew and scope of missions. You have a lot more space to move around and do Science! and whatever else.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The dragon capsule and falcon nine is a bus on boosters. It can only deliver people OR cargo. Not both.

    The space shuttle could deliver crew, cargo, and mission modules in one launch. It was a very versatile and 75% reusable too. Compared to falcon which is only about 50% reusable.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago

    The fastest turnaround time for a space shuttle was 54 days pre Challenger disaster and 88 days post Challenger disaster. It was very expensive and time consuming to reuse the space shuttle (they basically had to completely disassemble and reassemble the whole thing) which is one of the main reasons it has stopped flying. Falcon 9 on the other hand has a fastest turnaround time of 3 weeks. So not sure where you got your numbers from, but it seems to me that the Falcon 9 is a much better vehicle in terms of reuse.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent