you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    What you should say is that the science on it is advancing. Catching up implies that it is behind something else (or where it should be, which might be true actually but that is a difficult argument to make in the present) when that isn't the case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 3 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago (1 child)

    Again, now you are off the track. If it is science, it's science. If it's not science, it's not science. Science doesn't need to catch up. Either a thing is advancing science or it's not science.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 3 years ago (1 child)