you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 43 points 3 years ago (1 child)

Ugh. I'm not real happy about having to vote to uphold the gerontocracy, but as both likely frontrunners are a part thereof, all I can do is vote to minimize the harm.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    That’s only true if you live in a swing state. If your state’s certain to go one way or the other, vote your conscience, even if it’s a write-in.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I would argue the opposite. An increasing minority vote/poll in a "safe" state would pull resources away from swing states to keep the state "safe". Not many people would have imagined Georgia going blue in federal elections but here we are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (2 children)

    If things are bad enough that NY goes red, how I voted is the least of our problems.

    I mean actually red or blue states. Georgia’s dynamics have been moving centerward for years, and people who pay attention to that stuff knew that.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 years ago

    I live in Texas (a state that will go a certain way) and I will vote Dem. It makes no sense to me to help make a bigger gap between the Republicans and everybody else just because the Dems suck too.

    The "principled stance" a protest vote makes only helps embolden the current political hellscape within my own state. If I can chip away at the Republican power structure, I will do it.

  • source
  • parent