6
Does Lemmy have a stance on anti-vaccine or election denialism? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 4 years ago by to c/meta@lemmy.ml
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I've been seeing some concerning trends whereby anti-vaxx posts are defended as "free speech" and a growing number of users with "Trump Won" sentiments.

Is there going to be a stance taken on this? Or are we going to lose this community, like so many others, to propaganda and hatred?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 4 years ago* (1 child)

Adding to this, this comment NOT mean we endorse the posting of misinformation or that we personally agree with every post we don't remove, or even that all the admins agree on everything among themselves on how best to moderate. It just means that it can get messy trying to decipher what is misinformation and what isn't and we're not all-knowing, and that we trust the Lemmy community to respond with factual counterpoints to things they disagree with.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 7 points 4 years ago* (last edited 4 years ago) (3 children)

    @AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml My feed today has been 1:5 posts about antivax, and almost every thread has had some sort of election denialism.

    If we don't take a stand now we're going to be the next Voat/Gab/what have you. I came here because I was promised Leftists, not liberals. Take a stand and do something about this before it becomes a rapidly dying community.

    Also, in re: "We can't disprove it", yeah no shit: you can't disprove anything. The burden is on the person making the claim, not the person refuting it. But keep shifting that burden to logical impossibility. If that's the moderation view here, you just solidified lemmy's future content.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago*

    The burden is on the person making the claim, not the person refuting it.

    So the person reading the claim has the right to request proof before believing it, and they have the right to ignore the claim if proof isn't provided, as well as the right not to engage with the claimant at all.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent