71
When do you think violence is justified? (kbin.social)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
93 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Self defense? Only on the battlefield? Only to achieve a β€˜noble’ end?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There are situations where people have created a situation where you don't have total knowledge of the future, but acting in defense seems justified.

I think we can quibble over the specifics about what's reasonable, but you don't have to wait until you're bleeding out to defend yourself.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    For me personally, the answer to the original question would be "only once no other non-violent means are available".

    Does this resonate, or would you consider it different to your perspective? I see them as similar.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Personally, I'd prefer non-violent over violent means for myself. If other people are involved it would depend - I won't risk someone else's life if I can avoid it. I tell my niece that she's allowed to stab dudes that don't respond to "no".

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent