you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

Yes, and that is what gave me pause, it seemed too generic to be a coincidence, meaning that I read it as they only had sold 2 millions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    I had it pegged a little lower than what they got. I figured just upwards of three million.

    Two is too small, and saying 'multiple' seems like it's just sensational BS. Anything 5 and over, and they'd want to more clearly specify just how many millions they had sold. That leaves 3 and 4, but four would probably get a 'nearly five million'. That leaves three as the most likely, with four a small possibility. I figured 3.2-3.3 mil.

  • source
  • parent