▲ 119 ▼ Why btrfs gets huge perf hit with background IO work? (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by Alawami@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml 37 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] wviana@lemmy.eco.br 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) Oh. So I didn't need LVM and LUKS at my install? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 years ago Btrfs doesn't do encryption, so luks is still necessary. LVM isn't needed since btrfs subvolumes achieve the same in a more flexible way (no fixed size, snapshots). permalink fedilink source parent [–] axzxc1236@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Btrfs doesn't have built in encryption, if you want to encrypt Btrfs you still need another layer (e.g. LUKS). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Chewy7324@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 2 years ago Btrfs doesn't do encryption, so luks is still necessary. LVM isn't needed since btrfs subvolumes achieve the same in a more flexible way (no fixed size, snapshots). permalink fedilink source parent
[–] axzxc1236@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago Btrfs doesn't have built in encryption, if you want to encrypt Btrfs you still need another layer (e.g. LUKS). permalink fedilink source parent
