▲ 119 ▼ Why btrfs gets huge perf hit with background IO work? (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by Alawami@lemmy.world to c/linux@lemmy.ml 37 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) It probably has to do with the CoW nature of BTRFS compared to the others which don't do CoW. permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sarahnya@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 years ago (2 children) Bcachefs does use CoW iirc~ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] backhdlp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago It does, it says so in the first sentence of the Wikipedia article permalink fedilink source parent [–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Ah, BCacheFS is also a lot less of a clusterfuck then BTRFS is too permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sarahnya@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 years ago (2 children) Bcachefs does use CoW iirc~ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] backhdlp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago It does, it says so in the first sentence of the Wikipedia article permalink fedilink source parent [–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Ah, BCacheFS is also a lot less of a clusterfuck then BTRFS is too permalink fedilink source parent
[–] backhdlp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 years ago It does, it says so in the first sentence of the Wikipedia article permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago Ah, BCacheFS is also a lot less of a clusterfuck then BTRFS is too permalink fedilink source parent
