Being an ancap doesn't count. That's not a real ideology.
🥱
There's text and then there's subtext. You want access to a private space that can serve as a platform for you to voice your opinions
Dude where did I even say I want access to beehaw? You are completely full of shit. Subtext in this instance is just you making things up.
It's not bullshit, though, because that's the underlying premise of an authoritarian regime
In your mind yes, we've established your narrow view. In reality, no.
You don't have some inalienable right to access EVERY single space that exists in the physical or virtual world.
Dude, drop the damn strawman arguments. I can judge beehaw without demanding access to it, which is exactly what I've done.
Stormfront is a famous one. Places like this are ran by people who hold beliefs that I find absolutely despicable, and I'm sure they would actively ban anyone who was LGBT, leftist, anti-racist, etc.,
And you wouldn't see this as authoritatianism? Like you are so dense you're unable to see distinction between communities?
In other words, banning someone from a hospital or from employment on the basis of their identity is a material detriment to the collective public good.
... I'm not a collectivist.
So just to be clear, you don't believe in civil rights on an individual level? You see civil rights as contingent on government funding, and social norms? I see civil rights an an extension of personal autonomy.
So what about pre-civil war when legally blacks weren't seen as people by law or social norms?
What happens when say.. Abortions are determined to be against the collective good by a population? Body rights just stop being a thing?
Anyways I specifically talking about hypotheticals. Government funding and social norms aren't relevant to whether you'd personally be okay with McDonald's discriminating against gays, and whether you could understand that to be authoritarian. To make this easier we can pretend it's a small business under 15 employees with no government funding.