Asklemmy

hideshow 14 child comments

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world [S] 5 points 2 years ago (13 children)

So what's the finding?

hideshow 13 child comments

parent

[–] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 7 points 2 years ago (12 children)

It looks like you broke the interwebs my mate

hideshow 12 child comments

parent

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world [S] 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Did I actually do something bad? Like are y'all upset at me?

hideshow 2 child comments

parent

[–] Anbalsilfer@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

You're a grey hat. Technical problems like these are likely to never get fixed until their consequences are demonstrated.

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world [S] 1 point 2 years ago

I feel like I'm def more of an IdeasGuy, like I don't implement stuff but I guess I'm good at finding edge cases/outliers.

parent

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world [S] 2 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Yes but like quantified...

hideshow 8 child comments

parent

[–] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 3 points 2 years ago (7 children)

looks like 128 deep from here, and that number feels very familiar some how. I just cant place where Ive seen it before...

hideshow 7 child comments

parent

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Hmm... I got 99. The red line is there 14 times with full color change + 1 extra line. Each time it's 7 colors, so 99. I double-checked.

hideshow 4 child comments

parent

[–] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 11 points 2 years ago (1 child)

If in doubt look at the code:

const MAX_COMMENT_DEPTH_LIMIT: usize = 100;

I Guess that is the answer

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 years ago

Now, what would happen with other instances if you compiled it with higher number for your own 🤔

parent

[–] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

I think you are correct, I based it on:

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago

Maybe there are branches in the tree of comments?

parent

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

128 = 2^7; powers of 2 show up a lot in computing. Looks like it's 100 though per the below comment.

parent

[+] cheese_greater@lemmy.world [S] 1 point 2 years ago

[deleted]