you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

There are a lot of assumptions there.

First of all, I am sure that is part of something much larger and it is a real neighborhood, not something hypothetical.

Second, I don't see people giving up their car brains just because you put a tram. I myself would still be using a car if it wasn't made completely superfluous and fatiguing where I live and work.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    There are a lot of assumptions there.

    Absolutely.

    I am sure that is part of something much larger and it is a real neighborhood, not something hypothetical.

    I'd agree but I don't see how that makes a difference. My point was that the visible part could be served by even just one tram station. If there are more such parts, you'd obviously need tram stops for those aswell. (More tram stops would realistically be necessary anyways.)

    I don’t see people giving up their car brains just because you put a tram.

    Me neither. Point was that it'd be possible for those people to reasonably get where they need to go without any cars involved with as little infrastructure as a single tram stop.

  • source
  • parent