▲ 898 ▼ Should loud cars be banned? (lemdro.id) submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Xylight@lemdro.id to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world 107 comments fedilink hide all child comments (does not reflect my opinion, just thought it looked funny) Less hostile when in context. Taken from a YouTube channel called Not Just Bikes.
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 years ago (1 child) Is that true? They still send them out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] aniki@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) This article says the opposite though. Therefore, federal courts have affirmed the right of municipalities to use speeding and red light cameras. Additionally, lawsuits challenging the use of private companies to operate red light cameras have been dismissed or defeated. I am not a lawyer and I have wondered about the constitutional questions of these. But according to this the courts have largely allowed them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] aniki@lemm.ee -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 years ago Now it seems like you are reaching. Ballot initiatives have nothing to do with whether they are constitutional or not. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] aniki@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago* (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) This article says the opposite though. Therefore, federal courts have affirmed the right of municipalities to use speeding and red light cameras. Additionally, lawsuits challenging the use of private companies to operate red light cameras have been dismissed or defeated. I am not a lawyer and I have wondered about the constitutional questions of these. But according to this the courts have largely allowed them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] aniki@lemm.ee -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 years ago Now it seems like you are reaching. Ballot initiatives have nothing to do with whether they are constitutional or not. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 6 points 2 years ago (1 child) This article says the opposite though. Therefore, federal courts have affirmed the right of municipalities to use speeding and red light cameras. Additionally, lawsuits challenging the use of private companies to operate red light cameras have been dismissed or defeated. I am not a lawyer and I have wondered about the constitutional questions of these. But according to this the courts have largely allowed them. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] aniki@lemm.ee -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 years ago Now it seems like you are reaching. Ballot initiatives have nothing to do with whether they are constitutional or not. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] aniki@lemm.ee -3 points 2 years ago (1 child) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 years ago Now it seems like you are reaching. Ballot initiatives have nothing to do with whether they are constitutional or not. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 years ago Now it seems like you are reaching. Ballot initiatives have nothing to do with whether they are constitutional or not. permalink fedilink source parent
