▲ 57 ▼ Wisconsin governor gets creative with veto, increases public school funding for 400 years (www.usatoday.com) submitted 3 years ago by Col3814444@kbin.social to c/politics@kbin.social 10 comments fedilink hide all child comments In signing the state budget, Gov. Tony Evers used his broad partial veto powers to make permanent annual per-pupil increases for public schools.
[–] oxjox@kbin.social 11 points 3 years ago (1 child) LOL Page 158 permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Aldehyde@kbin.social 11 points 3 years ago (2 children) The result was good this time, but doesn’t that allow the governor to pass any law as long as they can find the right words in the right order? I can easily imagine this going very wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] parrot-party@kbin.social 11 points 3 years ago (1 child) I'm pretty sure this was done to freak out the legislation and force them to remove the partial veto permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Madison_rogue@kbin.social 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) They can only remove it via constitutional amendment, so it would have to go to the voters first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QHC@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago not remove the power of veto, just override this specific exercise of it permalink fedilink source parent [–] AshDene@kbin.social 3 points 3 years ago The manipulation of the numbers suggests that you just need the right letters in the right order... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Aldehyde@kbin.social 11 points 3 years ago (2 children) The result was good this time, but doesn’t that allow the governor to pass any law as long as they can find the right words in the right order? I can easily imagine this going very wrong. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] parrot-party@kbin.social 11 points 3 years ago (1 child) I'm pretty sure this was done to freak out the legislation and force them to remove the partial veto permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Madison_rogue@kbin.social 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) They can only remove it via constitutional amendment, so it would have to go to the voters first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QHC@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago not remove the power of veto, just override this specific exercise of it permalink fedilink source parent [–] AshDene@kbin.social 3 points 3 years ago The manipulation of the numbers suggests that you just need the right letters in the right order... permalink fedilink source parent
[–] parrot-party@kbin.social 11 points 3 years ago (1 child) I'm pretty sure this was done to freak out the legislation and force them to remove the partial veto permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Madison_rogue@kbin.social 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) They can only remove it via constitutional amendment, so it would have to go to the voters first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QHC@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago not remove the power of veto, just override this specific exercise of it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Madison_rogue@kbin.social 7 points 3 years ago (1 child) They can only remove it via constitutional amendment, so it would have to go to the voters first. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] QHC@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago not remove the power of veto, just override this specific exercise of it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QHC@kbin.social 1 point 3 years ago not remove the power of veto, just override this specific exercise of it permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AshDene@kbin.social 3 points 3 years ago The manipulation of the numbers suggests that you just need the right letters in the right order... permalink fedilink source parent