you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 48 points 2 years ago (13 children)

This is entirely separate of course from the much more basic issue that a car that breaks because of some fucking precipitation is not fit for purpose and this damage report would be indefensible just about anywhere in the world.

Two things here...

The source of this is ...The Mirror. Not exactly top shelf journalism. They thrive of outage, just like the Daily Fail. Keep that in mind when reading these trash sources.

I suspect the owner of the vehicle did a lot more than "drive it in a bit of rain" and is simply lying about it in order to try and get bailed out. Funnily enough I've not seen a queue of Tesla's broken down every time I drive in the rain.

It's certainly possible that the owner is telling the truth. But I doubt it. I doubt it a lot.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I've recovered Teslas that have "failed" in the rain. It means a moisture sensor has triggered. The car tells you they it can get to where you need to go but then will need to be serviced. It's a "first" generation problem rather than anything inherently wrong with electric cars.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It means a moisture sensor has triggered.

    Moisture sensors don't typically cost $21k. They said the batteries were full of water.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    Which is the part I don't really understand. Aren't these batteries pretty much all watercooled? Maybe the control electronics got wet causing it to keep the battery on in a flooded condition and thus draining them completely? Maybe just the moisture senser tripped, causing them to say, yeah, water damage, gotta replace it?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    The issue is the statement by the Tesla rep that bad weather was the cause. Now we don't have any confirmation they said that, but it would take nothing for Tesla to categorically deny that that is an acceptable reason to deny warranty, and state that any rep saying that was at fault. There. Done. Non-story.

    If they can't categorically deny that then that implies they actually are employing this excuse for their shoddy workmanship. It certainly wouldn't be the scummiest thing the company has done.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    What statement? What you read was not a statement but hearsay in the form of a vaguely retold exchange.

    Fuck Elon and Tesla but this isn't much to go on.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago*

    They got a statement from Tesla who said they were "investigating". You don't need to investigate to know that this is a bullshit reason to give, and their silence on that issue speaks volumes. Now, if the statements by the customers were not given to the Tesla rep to respond to, they would have ample opportunity to put out a statement explaining the problems with the article. Have they done that, or is it just silence? Any media rep worth their salt is absolutely going to be aware of this article.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Scotland is having some pretty extreme weather now, though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (3 children)

    Unless a tree fell on the car it shouldn't stop running because of some wind & rain. This is basic stuff, I don't know why people don't get this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments