(lemmy.ml)
submitted 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by to c/memes@lemmy.ml
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -6 points 3 years ago (10 children)

When docker get their shit together and work on freebsd? Sure

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago (7 children)

    That's a way taller order than you might think. Docker has loads of kernel level integration that FreeBSD isn't interested in supporting, also there are separate techs for similar purposes, like jails.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -6 points 3 years ago (6 children)

    Yeah, so if projects don't support freebsd I'm out. Tired of everyone's fetish for docker, even Canonical have added freebsd style jails to ubuntu now

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago (4 children)

    cgroups are very different and much more powerful than freebsd jails. The server world is leaving freebsd for Linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 3 years ago (3 children)

    Docker still sucks, though, and you should use podman instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago

    The problem with podman is that we use stuff like Docker-compose and tilt at work, that require the docker daemon socket. I do try to use podman when possible, though. But yeah, I avoid Red Hat these days, that company is doomed.

    I use kubernetes+containerd for my servers, which is neither Docker nor Podman.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago* (1 child)

    Podman to the rescue! Screw docker, podman is so much better and a quick google tells me there is a freebsd package of podman soooo

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment