▲ 558 ▼ Mastodon's Founder & CEO Gives His Thoughts on Meta's Threads (blog.joinmastodon.org) submitted 3 years ago by CthuluVoIP@lemmy.world to c/fediverse@lemmy.world 195 comments fedilink hide all child comments Found this post super informative as it relates to Mastodon, and thought Lemmy might also benefit from this perspective. I'm not sure I share his optimism, but his points seem sound to dampen some of the alarm bells over Meta joining the Fediverse.
[+] pennomi@lemmy.world 14 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IrrationalAndroid@lemmy.world 14 points 3 years ago (1 child) This might be a very pessimistic take, but I strongly feel like any average Joe will rather pick the Meta/big corp alternative to the FOSS one. The fact that Meta's got a reputation for Facebook and Instagram while Mastodon's got a reputation for being confusing is... very not promising. Basically I feel like this is a lost race already. Hope it's just me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 years ago Lol Meta has a reputation for stealing data, denying genocide, platforming bigots, and interfering in elections. The idea that the name Facebook wasn't so toxic that one of the largest tech companies did a massive rebranding in the wake of major scandal (see threatening democracy) is a fantasy. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Kaldo@kbin.social 7 points 3 years ago And that's precisely why the worry, because there is no chance in hell that fediverse can provide a better, stable and more feature-filled service than an established multibillion corporation like meta. permalink fedilink source parent [–] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 years ago* I think the only problem here is that Eugene has shown absolutely no interest in developing that way. I think that's what feels so silly about this whole post, he's forgetting that the ways in which Mastodon are opinionated are not popular even among Mastodon essentialists. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IrrationalAndroid@lemmy.world 14 points 3 years ago (1 child) This might be a very pessimistic take, but I strongly feel like any average Joe will rather pick the Meta/big corp alternative to the FOSS one. The fact that Meta's got a reputation for Facebook and Instagram while Mastodon's got a reputation for being confusing is... very not promising. Basically I feel like this is a lost race already. Hope it's just me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 years ago Lol Meta has a reputation for stealing data, denying genocide, platforming bigots, and interfering in elections. The idea that the name Facebook wasn't so toxic that one of the largest tech companies did a massive rebranding in the wake of major scandal (see threatening democracy) is a fantasy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 years ago Lol Meta has a reputation for stealing data, denying genocide, platforming bigots, and interfering in elections. The idea that the name Facebook wasn't so toxic that one of the largest tech companies did a massive rebranding in the wake of major scandal (see threatening democracy) is a fantasy. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Kaldo@kbin.social 7 points 3 years ago And that's precisely why the worry, because there is no chance in hell that fediverse can provide a better, stable and more feature-filled service than an established multibillion corporation like meta. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] spaduf@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 years ago* I think the only problem here is that Eugene has shown absolutely no interest in developing that way. I think that's what feels so silly about this whole post, he's forgetting that the ways in which Mastodon are opinionated are not popular even among Mastodon essentialists. permalink fedilink source parent