▲ 148 ▼ Indigenous Voice: Australians reject historic Indigenous referendum - BBC News (bbc.in) submitted 2 years ago by EdenRester@kbin.social to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml 100 comments fedilink hide all child comments Australian national broadcaster ABC has projected three states voted No, effectively defeating the referendum.
[–] MxM111@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (4 children) I was not talking about legality. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago (3 children) That’s odd, as your first sentence talks about laws. Maybe you said something you didn’t mean. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] MxM111@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) One can talk about laws and yet not discuss their legality, but their morality. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes, one can. You however were comparing comparison under laws, which is speaking about legalities. You were incorrect. Doubling down just makes it clear you are not discussing in good faith, but have been caught in a lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MxM111@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago No, I do not know how you get this impression. Please reread my posts. I was talking about what laws should be for good society, not what can or can not be allowed legally. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 2 years ago (3 children) That’s odd, as your first sentence talks about laws. Maybe you said something you didn’t mean. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] MxM111@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) One can talk about laws and yet not discuss their legality, but their morality. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes, one can. You however were comparing comparison under laws, which is speaking about legalities. You were incorrect. Doubling down just makes it clear you are not discussing in good faith, but have been caught in a lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MxM111@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago No, I do not know how you get this impression. Please reread my posts. I was talking about what laws should be for good society, not what can or can not be allowed legally. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MxM111@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago (2 children) One can talk about laws and yet not discuss their legality, but their morality. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes, one can. You however were comparing comparison under laws, which is speaking about legalities. You were incorrect. Doubling down just makes it clear you are not discussing in good faith, but have been caught in a lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MxM111@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago No, I do not know how you get this impression. Please reread my posts. I was talking about what laws should be for good society, not what can or can not be allowed legally. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) Yes, one can. You however were comparing comparison under laws, which is speaking about legalities. You were incorrect. Doubling down just makes it clear you are not discussing in good faith, but have been caught in a lie. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] MxM111@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago No, I do not know how you get this impression. Please reread my posts. I was talking about what laws should be for good society, not what can or can not be allowed legally. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MxM111@kbin.social 1 point 2 years ago No, I do not know how you get this impression. Please reread my posts. I was talking about what laws should be for good society, not what can or can not be allowed legally. permalink fedilink source parent