255
important rulepost (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
210 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

yes because it's not anything intelligent enough to be thoughtfully argued against. a 7 year old could see the holes in such an idea

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    I oppose one more system of authority than you do, in the interest of ideological consistency, intellectual honesty.

    are you taking the position of a literal child?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    is revolution not putting the authority of the people over those in power, and bringing those people low? that's "hierarchy"

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago*

    that depends if you draw distinction between the people and the state (which is merely an abstraction of capital)

    state capitalism, as defined by lenin, is not a classless society, and is indefensible as a liberatory philosophy.

    just as liberalism abolished the monarchy only to replace it with a dictatorship of private capital, authoritarian socialism replaced monarchy with a beaurocratic ruling class and unilateral control of the means of production.

    the neck cares not the color of the boot

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent