▲ 1069 ▼ Hey Google, go fuck yourself entirely (thelemmy.club) submitted 2 years ago by Sabre363@sh.itjust.works to c/crappydesign@sh.itjust.works 265 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] AtmaJnana@lemmy.world 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children) yeah, this is a policy OP doesn't like, not bad design permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 9 child comments replies: [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (5 children) Ads are crappy by design. I think the spirit of the community is upheld with this post. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Enfors@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (4 children) Well yes, nobody likes ads. But think of it this way - ads are "democratic" in a way, because it means everybody can "afford" or access that which is financed by the ads. Most websites are expensive to run and have to make money somehow to pay for itself - as much as I dislike ads, I'm not sure what the alternative would be? Should we have to pay to access each and every website? I don't know what the best solution would be, to be hones. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (3 children) Ads have nothing to do with democracy; they are forced upon us and serve no other purpose than to manipulate you into buying a product. That's text-book capitalism for you. Personally, as an open-source developer, I use crowd-funding to cover the expenses for the websites and software I provide. You will find no ads or tracking on my pages, and the same can be said for the majority of open-source projects. The problem is rarely tied to cost; usually, it's about greed and the never-ending chase for higher profit margins. Mind you, I'm just a single individual with a single experience, but if I can find a way to get paid for my work without forcing people to watch the visual diarrhea, so can the giants like Google. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] MrLuemasG@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) YouTube only barely breaks even as it is. What profit margins are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago* (1 child) In Q3 of 2022 alone, Alphabet, the parent company of Google, recorded a profit (not revenue!) of 13.9 billion USD. Their financial position is more than secure. https://abc.xyz/assets/investor/static/pdf/2022Q3_alphabet_earnings_release.pdf?cache=4156e7f permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] MrLuemasG@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Even excusing the policy, the design is actually pretty shit though. We're all just used to it so it feels default and normal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AtmaJnana@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago That's fair. I agree, it's mediocre at best. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works [S] 0 points 2 years ago While this is a policy I don't like, it's also something that is purposely destroying the usability of the Internet. Which I think constitutes a bad design. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (5 children) Ads are crappy by design. I think the spirit of the community is upheld with this post. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Enfors@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (4 children) Well yes, nobody likes ads. But think of it this way - ads are "democratic" in a way, because it means everybody can "afford" or access that which is financed by the ads. Most websites are expensive to run and have to make money somehow to pay for itself - as much as I dislike ads, I'm not sure what the alternative would be? Should we have to pay to access each and every website? I don't know what the best solution would be, to be hones. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (3 children) Ads have nothing to do with democracy; they are forced upon us and serve no other purpose than to manipulate you into buying a product. That's text-book capitalism for you. Personally, as an open-source developer, I use crowd-funding to cover the expenses for the websites and software I provide. You will find no ads or tracking on my pages, and the same can be said for the majority of open-source projects. The problem is rarely tied to cost; usually, it's about greed and the never-ending chase for higher profit margins. Mind you, I'm just a single individual with a single experience, but if I can find a way to get paid for my work without forcing people to watch the visual diarrhea, so can the giants like Google. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] MrLuemasG@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) YouTube only barely breaks even as it is. What profit margins are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago* (1 child) In Q3 of 2022 alone, Alphabet, the parent company of Google, recorded a profit (not revenue!) of 13.9 billion USD. Their financial position is more than secure. https://abc.xyz/assets/investor/static/pdf/2022Q3_alphabet_earnings_release.pdf?cache=4156e7f permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] MrLuemasG@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Enfors@lemm.ee -2 points 2 years ago (4 children) Well yes, nobody likes ads. But think of it this way - ads are "democratic" in a way, because it means everybody can "afford" or access that which is financed by the ads. Most websites are expensive to run and have to make money somehow to pay for itself - as much as I dislike ads, I'm not sure what the alternative would be? Should we have to pay to access each and every website? I don't know what the best solution would be, to be hones. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (3 children) Ads have nothing to do with democracy; they are forced upon us and serve no other purpose than to manipulate you into buying a product. That's text-book capitalism for you. Personally, as an open-source developer, I use crowd-funding to cover the expenses for the websites and software I provide. You will find no ads or tracking on my pages, and the same can be said for the majority of open-source projects. The problem is rarely tied to cost; usually, it's about greed and the never-ending chase for higher profit margins. Mind you, I'm just a single individual with a single experience, but if I can find a way to get paid for my work without forcing people to watch the visual diarrhea, so can the giants like Google. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] MrLuemasG@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) YouTube only barely breaks even as it is. What profit margins are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago* (1 child) In Q3 of 2022 alone, Alphabet, the parent company of Google, recorded a profit (not revenue!) of 13.9 billion USD. Their financial position is more than secure. https://abc.xyz/assets/investor/static/pdf/2022Q3_alphabet_earnings_release.pdf?cache=4156e7f permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] MrLuemasG@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago (3 children) Ads have nothing to do with democracy; they are forced upon us and serve no other purpose than to manipulate you into buying a product. That's text-book capitalism for you. Personally, as an open-source developer, I use crowd-funding to cover the expenses for the websites and software I provide. You will find no ads or tracking on my pages, and the same can be said for the majority of open-source projects. The problem is rarely tied to cost; usually, it's about greed and the never-ending chase for higher profit margins. Mind you, I'm just a single individual with a single experience, but if I can find a way to get paid for my work without forcing people to watch the visual diarrhea, so can the giants like Google. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] MrLuemasG@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) YouTube only barely breaks even as it is. What profit margins are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago* (1 child) In Q3 of 2022 alone, Alphabet, the parent company of Google, recorded a profit (not revenue!) of 13.9 billion USD. Their financial position is more than secure. https://abc.xyz/assets/investor/static/pdf/2022Q3_alphabet_earnings_release.pdf?cache=4156e7f permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] MrLuemasG@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MrLuemasG@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (2 children) YouTube only barely breaks even as it is. What profit margins are you talking about? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago* (1 child) In Q3 of 2022 alone, Alphabet, the parent company of Google, recorded a profit (not revenue!) of 13.9 billion USD. Their financial position is more than secure. https://abc.xyz/assets/investor/static/pdf/2022Q3_alphabet_earnings_release.pdf?cache=4156e7f permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] MrLuemasG@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago* (1 child) In Q3 of 2022 alone, Alphabet, the parent company of Google, recorded a profit (not revenue!) of 13.9 billion USD. Their financial position is more than secure. https://abc.xyz/assets/investor/static/pdf/2022Q3_alphabet_earnings_release.pdf?cache=4156e7f permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [+] MrLuemasG@lemmy.world 1 point 2 years ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Even excusing the policy, the design is actually pretty shit though. We're all just used to it so it feels default and normal. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] AtmaJnana@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago That's fair. I agree, it's mediocre at best. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AtmaJnana@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago That's fair. I agree, it's mediocre at best. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works [S] 0 points 2 years ago While this is a policy I don't like, it's also something that is purposely destroying the usability of the Internet. Which I think constitutes a bad design. permalink fedilink source parent