1069
Hey Google, go fuck yourself entirely (thelemmy.club)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/crappydesign@sh.itjust.works
265 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 2 years ago (18 children)

This is a long time coming. Who in their right mind thought that a service that allows pretty much anyone to upload gigabytes of videos would be free forever. I get that people don't like ads, but the amount of outrage is overkill.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
    •
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Don't care, there are billions of hours lifetime saved by adblocking.

    Nobody needs to defend this tech conglomerates, let them figure it out.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    What if the solution they come to is shutting the whole thing down? Isn't a degraded add riddled experience better than nothing?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Do you people really think that YouTube can pay five-year-old "influencers" millions of dollars a year because YouTube is losing money?

    What if the solution they come to is shutting the whole thing down?

    Good fucking riddance.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Good fucking riddance

    So then don't use it if you want it gone?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    They should close their doors to anyone they don't want to have on their site, so other companies get a chance to compete. Why would we stop using it, i'm literally fine with ad-free Youtube, you're the one having a problem with it.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    They should close their doors to anyone they don't want to have on their site

    That's exactly what they're doing with the ad block check.

    you're the one having a problem with it.

    You don't know what I do or do not have a problem with.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 35 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    It’s less about not liking ads and more that the ads are plagued with scams, spam and whatever else.

    Don’t we think that they should be held accountable for the type of ads they run on there? Crypto scams, get rich quick, and mlms to name a few.

    The same goes for the MSN homepage it’s fucking ridiculous.

    Also, if they want to serve me ads, then stop selling my data too. If I sign up for premium they’ll still sell your data anyway.

    I am not really in a place where I would want to defend billion dollar companies.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    What's do you think selling the data is for? It's largely to better target ads. It makes sense to complain that premium sells your data, but that they sell your data and show you ads is pretty much the point of selling your data.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The discussions I'm seeing are not about the contents of the ads but simply because they can't bypass them anymore.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago (1 child)

    You say as you reply to a comment explicitly discussing the content of the ads.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 years ago

    So you raise an argument, I respond by telling you it's not the main argument I'm seeing itt, and your response is to point back at your singular comment?

    Don't get me wrong, I agree with you 100%, but most people here are just mad they can't get YT for free as easily anymore.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    I can only speak for myself, but it’s less about the monetizing and more about the how.

    The ads are intrusive and highly disrespectful of our time. Not to mention the bullcrap they’re allowed to advertise that would get videos demonetized. And the risk of malware from the ads.

    I can understand things like premium. Heck if they wanted to lock HD behind premium I could understand. It costs a lot of money to run that crap so getting money for that service does make sense.

    But by solving that with intrusive, annoying, possibly dangerous ads? I will block the ads. Find a better way because that ain’t it. I will sooner leave YouTube for other video sites satisfying my interests that are currently being advertised by creators on YouTube itself, than accept the crappy ads.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Google, apparently, when they bought YouTube. "let's host terabytes of data and stream it to users for nothing" and then do just that for over a decade before they realized "oh shit, that costs money I guess??"

    Google fucked themselves. But it's not like they can't foot the bill either, based on their net profits. The fact that they are now telling people that the service they've used for nearly 20 years doesn't want to be free anymore is a valid reason for outrage.

    It's like your partner of 20 years deciding that sex is now a per-month expense, when it wasn't up to that point. A bit "you fuckin wot m8" moment.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •