▲ 1192 ▼ Israel's siege of Gaza is illegal, EU says (euobserver.com) submitted 3 years ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml 407 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -10 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 5 points 3 years ago (6 children) Yes, the USSR and Nazi Germany were definitely working together, not sure what you're talking about here. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov–Ribbentrop_Pact permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -9 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago* (4 children) I think you need to take a breath mate... Yes, the USSR and Nazi Germany were cooperative during WWII until the Nazis thought they could expand the eastern front. That is just a fact. I'm not saying they were Allied, but they weren't exactly enemies until the Nazi betrayal of said NAP. I did not bring up the US at any point in my comment, but no I don't believe they were the good guy in this situation either. The civil rights of minorities in the US at the time were appalling and it's no wonder Hitler looked at that and sought to implement it against the "undesirables" in his country Not all disagreement is hostile or an attack, I was simply providing a correction to the previous statement that the USSR and Nazi Germany did not militarily benefit each other. If you disagree that their agreements did not have military benefits for both sides, then I very much would like to hear that argument. Obviously once Germany expanded the eastern front, there was no cooperation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -7 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) In my opinion, a joint agreement of boundaries of a soon to be annexed country would be beneficial to both parties. This is a rough analogy that doesn't touch on many of the intricacies of global politics so bear with me. If you and your neighbor both have a claim to a plot of land between you, and your options are to work together and come to an agreement, or to fight over it, wouldn't it be beneficial to both to make the agreement? No, at no point were the USSR and Nazis allied. There were no trade agreements, no personnel support, and no treaty outside of the Pact. However, I think it is disingenuous to say that the USSR and Nazi Germany did not militarily benefit each other. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -10 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago What the fuck? Poland, Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, the entirety of the Eastern European Bloc? I can tell you have it in your mind that this is me vs socialism or some weird argument. I'm done engaging with this conversation. Foul smell coming off your comments. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 5 points 3 years ago (6 children) Yes, the USSR and Nazi Germany were definitely working together, not sure what you're talking about here. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov–Ribbentrop_Pact permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -9 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago* (4 children) I think you need to take a breath mate... Yes, the USSR and Nazi Germany were cooperative during WWII until the Nazis thought they could expand the eastern front. That is just a fact. I'm not saying they were Allied, but they weren't exactly enemies until the Nazi betrayal of said NAP. I did not bring up the US at any point in my comment, but no I don't believe they were the good guy in this situation either. The civil rights of minorities in the US at the time were appalling and it's no wonder Hitler looked at that and sought to implement it against the "undesirables" in his country Not all disagreement is hostile or an attack, I was simply providing a correction to the previous statement that the USSR and Nazi Germany did not militarily benefit each other. If you disagree that their agreements did not have military benefits for both sides, then I very much would like to hear that argument. Obviously once Germany expanded the eastern front, there was no cooperation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -7 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) In my opinion, a joint agreement of boundaries of a soon to be annexed country would be beneficial to both parties. This is a rough analogy that doesn't touch on many of the intricacies of global politics so bear with me. If you and your neighbor both have a claim to a plot of land between you, and your options are to work together and come to an agreement, or to fight over it, wouldn't it be beneficial to both to make the agreement? No, at no point were the USSR and Nazis allied. There were no trade agreements, no personnel support, and no treaty outside of the Pact. However, I think it is disingenuous to say that the USSR and Nazi Germany did not militarily benefit each other. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -10 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago What the fuck? Poland, Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, the entirety of the Eastern European Bloc? I can tell you have it in your mind that this is me vs socialism or some weird argument. I'm done engaging with this conversation. Foul smell coming off your comments. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -9 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (5 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago* (4 children) I think you need to take a breath mate... Yes, the USSR and Nazi Germany were cooperative during WWII until the Nazis thought they could expand the eastern front. That is just a fact. I'm not saying they were Allied, but they weren't exactly enemies until the Nazi betrayal of said NAP. I did not bring up the US at any point in my comment, but no I don't believe they were the good guy in this situation either. The civil rights of minorities in the US at the time were appalling and it's no wonder Hitler looked at that and sought to implement it against the "undesirables" in his country Not all disagreement is hostile or an attack, I was simply providing a correction to the previous statement that the USSR and Nazi Germany did not militarily benefit each other. If you disagree that their agreements did not have military benefits for both sides, then I very much would like to hear that argument. Obviously once Germany expanded the eastern front, there was no cooperation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -7 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) In my opinion, a joint agreement of boundaries of a soon to be annexed country would be beneficial to both parties. This is a rough analogy that doesn't touch on many of the intricacies of global politics so bear with me. If you and your neighbor both have a claim to a plot of land between you, and your options are to work together and come to an agreement, or to fight over it, wouldn't it be beneficial to both to make the agreement? No, at no point were the USSR and Nazis allied. There were no trade agreements, no personnel support, and no treaty outside of the Pact. However, I think it is disingenuous to say that the USSR and Nazi Germany did not militarily benefit each other. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -10 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago What the fuck? Poland, Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, the entirety of the Eastern European Bloc? I can tell you have it in your mind that this is me vs socialism or some weird argument. I'm done engaging with this conversation. Foul smell coming off your comments. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago* (4 children) I think you need to take a breath mate... Yes, the USSR and Nazi Germany were cooperative during WWII until the Nazis thought they could expand the eastern front. That is just a fact. I'm not saying they were Allied, but they weren't exactly enemies until the Nazi betrayal of said NAP. I did not bring up the US at any point in my comment, but no I don't believe they were the good guy in this situation either. The civil rights of minorities in the US at the time were appalling and it's no wonder Hitler looked at that and sought to implement it against the "undesirables" in his country Not all disagreement is hostile or an attack, I was simply providing a correction to the previous statement that the USSR and Nazi Germany did not militarily benefit each other. If you disagree that their agreements did not have military benefits for both sides, then I very much would like to hear that argument. Obviously once Germany expanded the eastern front, there was no cooperation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -7 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) In my opinion, a joint agreement of boundaries of a soon to be annexed country would be beneficial to both parties. This is a rough analogy that doesn't touch on many of the intricacies of global politics so bear with me. If you and your neighbor both have a claim to a plot of land between you, and your options are to work together and come to an agreement, or to fight over it, wouldn't it be beneficial to both to make the agreement? No, at no point were the USSR and Nazis allied. There were no trade agreements, no personnel support, and no treaty outside of the Pact. However, I think it is disingenuous to say that the USSR and Nazi Germany did not militarily benefit each other. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -10 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago What the fuck? Poland, Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, the entirety of the Eastern European Bloc? I can tell you have it in your mind that this is me vs socialism or some weird argument. I'm done engaging with this conversation. Foul smell coming off your comments. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -7 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) In my opinion, a joint agreement of boundaries of a soon to be annexed country would be beneficial to both parties. This is a rough analogy that doesn't touch on many of the intricacies of global politics so bear with me. If you and your neighbor both have a claim to a plot of land between you, and your options are to work together and come to an agreement, or to fight over it, wouldn't it be beneficial to both to make the agreement? No, at no point were the USSR and Nazis allied. There were no trade agreements, no personnel support, and no treaty outside of the Pact. However, I think it is disingenuous to say that the USSR and Nazi Germany did not militarily benefit each other. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -10 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago What the fuck? Poland, Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, the entirety of the Eastern European Bloc? I can tell you have it in your mind that this is me vs socialism or some weird argument. I'm done engaging with this conversation. Foul smell coming off your comments. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 2 points 3 years ago (2 children) In my opinion, a joint agreement of boundaries of a soon to be annexed country would be beneficial to both parties. This is a rough analogy that doesn't touch on many of the intricacies of global politics so bear with me. If you and your neighbor both have a claim to a plot of land between you, and your options are to work together and come to an agreement, or to fight over it, wouldn't it be beneficial to both to make the agreement? No, at no point were the USSR and Nazis allied. There were no trade agreements, no personnel support, and no treaty outside of the Pact. However, I think it is disingenuous to say that the USSR and Nazi Germany did not militarily benefit each other. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -10 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago What the fuck? Poland, Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, the entirety of the Eastern European Bloc? I can tell you have it in your mind that this is me vs socialism or some weird argument. I'm done engaging with this conversation. Foul smell coming off your comments. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -10 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago What the fuck? Poland, Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, the entirety of the Eastern European Bloc? I can tell you have it in your mind that this is me vs socialism or some weird argument. I'm done engaging with this conversation. Foul smell coming off your comments. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rusty_Red@lemm.ee 4 points 3 years ago What the fuck? Poland, Ukraine, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, the entirety of the Eastern European Bloc? I can tell you have it in your mind that this is me vs socialism or some weird argument. I'm done engaging with this conversation. Foul smell coming off your comments. permalink fedilink source parent