you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I would disagree, or rather: it depends. You can print the --help of bash, but will that actually tell you anything about bash except a really superficial subset of flags? In the same way that the author argues that the help of his tool is too long to be useful, the help of bash is to short for the same reason. He argues that "cloud tools have a gazillion options where UNIX tools have good defaults". Bash has a gazillion options and no good defaults. As a matter of fact, bash on defaults is fairly dangerous. Yet, it is at the heart of most Unix systems today I'd argue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 years ago

    Definitely depends, yeah. bash is a huge piece of software that - for me - feels a bit out of place in other systems closer to original unix. Interesting ones are rc and even plain old /bin/sh provided by something like busybox.

  • source
  • parent