98
Is the purpose of life to be happy? (lemmy.ca)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
105 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

When I’m unhappy, I feel like I’m doing life wrong. I’d rather be happy. But is happiness the point of life, or is there more to it? If I pursue happiness, mine first then for those around me, is that selfish? But if there’s a bigger purpose, then what about people with Alzheimer’s or dementia who can’t recall recent experiences or make plans?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 2 years ago* (7 children)

There's no purpose. Do whatever you will do. There was never another option.

Hey, it could be worse. There's no failing per se and this is neutral (rather than hostile) towards whatever personal goal you make up.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 years ago (6 children)

    Okay. Life has no purpose. And free will is an illusion. Are we just living out a simulation?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Maybe, does it matter? As a property of the universe it has neither predictive power nor falsifiability.

    If it is, I think it's fair to say it's not a human-centric simulation. I suppose it could be life-centric or intelligence-centric (Fermi paradox explanation?), but it could just as easily be an investigation into conformal field theories, and the creators don't even realise there's an equivalent gravitational weak field system present yet.

    I think it's also worth asking how you define "simulation". It's possible to have a system who's state can be read two different ways but in which it's not clear which of the two is more "real". The holographic theory I touched on there is a great example.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It probably matters to people who are looking for an external source of meaning, and doesn’t matter to people who are creating an internal source of meaning. In that way, it’s maybe a useful clue to what type of meaning is more valid.

    In the scenario you gave, how would you judge whether a life was well lived? How would you go about living a good life? What would you do or become to be an effective human being?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    You mean in the no-free-will purposeless-universe scenario? I think there's no right or wrong answer, really. Every human being (and animal, and plant, and rock) are simply what they are. You have to add somewhat arbitrary personal criteria to get a meaningful answer.

    Personally, I think being kind and strong is very important. That's not very original, but I guess the interesting thing I have to say about it is that 99% of the population earnestly tries to do that, and the reason people suck is basically down to a version of Hanlon's razor. To be an effective human being, don't lie to yourself.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •