▲ 888 ▼ Meta wants to charge EU users $14 a month if they don't agree to personalized ads on Facebook and Instagram (www.businessinsider.com) submitted 2 years ago by L4s@lemmy.world [M, B] to c/technology@lemmy.world 211 comments fedilink hide all child comments Meta wants to charge EU users $14 a month if they don't agree to personalized ads on Facebook and Instagram::Meta is considering offering ad-free versions of Facebook and Instagram for $14 a month – but only in Europe.
[–] kinther@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago (1 child) No permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 years ago (2 children) I'd maybe be willing to pay $12-15 per annum for no user tracking. But that price per month is a joke. They just want to deter people from paying by offering an inflated price, so they can turn around in a few months and argue there is no demand for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kinther@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago I think the goal is to say they offer both an ad free and ad supported experience. The user then can choose which they want. This may skirt some grey areas in the law since it really puts the burden on the user to choose. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago Facebook obviously makes more the 12 to 15 dollars per year per user on ads. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 years ago (2 children) I'd maybe be willing to pay $12-15 per annum for no user tracking. But that price per month is a joke. They just want to deter people from paying by offering an inflated price, so they can turn around in a few months and argue there is no demand for it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kinther@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago I think the goal is to say they offer both an ad free and ad supported experience. The user then can choose which they want. This may skirt some grey areas in the law since it really puts the burden on the user to choose. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago Facebook obviously makes more the 12 to 15 dollars per year per user on ads. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kinther@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago I think the goal is to say they offer both an ad free and ad supported experience. The user then can choose which they want. This may skirt some grey areas in the law since it really puts the burden on the user to choose. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago Facebook obviously makes more the 12 to 15 dollars per year per user on ads. permalink fedilink source parent