this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2023
125 points (93.1% liked)

Asklemmy

43761 readers
1173 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is it at all possible that instead of being pushed away, we are instead getting pulled toward something huuuuuge via gravity? As if we are falling into something way greater than ourselves? I thought this was a wild idea but after I Googled it I found out that there is such a thing as a “Great Attractor”. Something 150 million light-years away is literally pulling all nearby galaxies towards it but no one knows exactly what it is.

So how do we know there aren’t any other Great Attractors, Greater Attractors, ad infinitum?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

No. Local attractive forces, like gravity, especially those at the atomic level, overpower the expansion for tightly coupled systems. So the earth isn't expanding, and neither are the people on it. I don't recall exactly what scale it kicks in at, but there is a good chance it's not even affecting the distance between planets in a system. Most likely it only plays a role in inter-planetary-systems and larger. Ie, stars get further apart from each other.

Edit. This explains it better https://www.astronomy.com/science/does-the-space-inside-an-atom-expand-with-the-universe/

That says that the expansion really only applies to the space between galaxies. In anything smaller than that, gravity still overpowers the expensive forces. Making it far weaker than I initially thought.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's at a much, much larger scale** than that


our local group is collapsing in on itself, and it's ~10M lightyears in diameter.

** talking about length scales only makes sense in reference to the specifics


two bananas separated by 10M lightyears, with no other matter nearby, would (I'm guessing) be expanded away, but a cluster of galaxies will not.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Using a banana for scale really made this so much better. :)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah, finally I can imagine the vastness of space. Thank you, bananas!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wouldn't it cause some sort of force locally at the atomic level all the same even for tightly coupled systems? They shouldn't feel the expansion as it is not a force from my understanding but just growth of space itself. But for example wouldn't the orbit around an atom be off just so slightly that it would need to expend some level of energy to correct for lack of better word.

Or do we think this does happen but the amount is so small that we can not measure it experimentally in any way.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

My understanding is that it does exert a force everywhere, even locally. It's just so incredibly weak that other local forces dominate and overpower it. Take the classic example of expansion as ants on a balloon as it's inflated. The expansion wants to pull them apart, but if they were tied to each other by thread, the thread would be stronger and they would stay together. The thread represents the inter molecular forces. Also remember that the expansion force is in every direction, without an origin, so from an atom's perspective the force seems to push outward,not from the side, so there would be no "offset".