you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

There was a recent court ruling that prevented SF from being able to practically touch any sidewalk encampment: https://apnews.com/article/lawsuits-oakland-9685f0a4350f8eb45602417ad334006f

The story of Newsom going to the Supreme Court is because they need to bypass that ruling if they want to be able to move people out who are refusing offers of shelter.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 3 years ago

    if they want to be able to move people out who are refusing offers of shelter.

    Which, to be clear, they absolutely shouldn't. The shelter system has failed and further victimization of the unhoused will only hurt people without addressing any of the root causes.

  • source
  • parent