▲ 737 ▼ Congressman ‘Caught on Camera’ Pulling Fire Alarm to in Apparent Attempt to Delay Vote to Avoid Shutdown (www.mediaite.com) submitted 2 years ago by FlyingSquid@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world 124 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Seraph@kbin.social 52 points 2 years ago (1 child) It's the thing Republicans can't understand though: he's "our team" but we don't care and the appropriate charges should be pressed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (3 children) I mean technically he didn't actually do much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Seraph@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (4 children) IANAL but didn't he obstruct Congress? Wow I hate that acronym! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago False alarms are against the law regardless of it being an attempt to fuck with Congress. Which is probably why an aid wouldn't do it for him. They knew they'd at least lose their job, and possibly get fined or have a few days in jail. permalink fedilink source parent [–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 9 points 2 years ago I for one LOVE that the not a lawyer acronym sounds like an Asimov porn parody 😂 permalink fedilink source parent [–] brainrein@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago But if he did it to give the representatives the opportunity to read the bill they were about to vote on to make sure that they’re not being tricked by the Republicans — then he was supporting Congress permalink fedilink source parent [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago Hello anal I'm dad. More seriously, it seems like it'd be a pain to prove, since he has a (shitty) excuse. permalink fedilink source parent [–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) In some jurisdictions, false reporting of emergencies is illegal. Not sure about DC or the halls of Congress. The proverbial false yelling of "fire" in crowded theater is literally one of the test examples for limitations that should be placed on free speech because it is so dangerous. Profoundly stupid. Your hapless opponents are creating all the bad press they can for you. How did he possibly think this would help? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 2 years ago Yelling fire in a crowded theater has been protected speech since the 60s The case was later partially overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio in 1969, which limited the scope of banned speech to that which would be directed to and likely to incite imminent lawless action (e.g. a riot).[1] permalink fedilink source parent [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago* Okay so apparently he did it so the senate could actually read the bill they were signing as there was no time before the government shutdown so that adds interesting context at least. permalink fedilink source parent [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Yeah I think he should probably get a stern talking to from a fire marshal and punished if he does it again permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (3 children) I mean technically he didn't actually do much. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Seraph@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (4 children) IANAL but didn't he obstruct Congress? Wow I hate that acronym! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago False alarms are against the law regardless of it being an attempt to fuck with Congress. Which is probably why an aid wouldn't do it for him. They knew they'd at least lose their job, and possibly get fined or have a few days in jail. permalink fedilink source parent [–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 9 points 2 years ago I for one LOVE that the not a lawyer acronym sounds like an Asimov porn parody 😂 permalink fedilink source parent [–] brainrein@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago But if he did it to give the representatives the opportunity to read the bill they were about to vote on to make sure that they’re not being tricked by the Republicans — then he was supporting Congress permalink fedilink source parent [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago Hello anal I'm dad. More seriously, it seems like it'd be a pain to prove, since he has a (shitty) excuse. permalink fedilink source parent [–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) In some jurisdictions, false reporting of emergencies is illegal. Not sure about DC or the halls of Congress. The proverbial false yelling of "fire" in crowded theater is literally one of the test examples for limitations that should be placed on free speech because it is so dangerous. Profoundly stupid. Your hapless opponents are creating all the bad press they can for you. How did he possibly think this would help? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 2 years ago Yelling fire in a crowded theater has been protected speech since the 60s The case was later partially overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio in 1969, which limited the scope of banned speech to that which would be directed to and likely to incite imminent lawless action (e.g. a riot).[1] permalink fedilink source parent [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago* Okay so apparently he did it so the senate could actually read the bill they were signing as there was no time before the government shutdown so that adds interesting context at least. permalink fedilink source parent [–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Yeah I think he should probably get a stern talking to from a fire marshal and punished if he does it again permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Seraph@kbin.social 14 points 2 years ago (4 children) IANAL but didn't he obstruct Congress? Wow I hate that acronym! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago False alarms are against the law regardless of it being an attempt to fuck with Congress. Which is probably why an aid wouldn't do it for him. They knew they'd at least lose their job, and possibly get fined or have a few days in jail. permalink fedilink source parent [–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 9 points 2 years ago I for one LOVE that the not a lawyer acronym sounds like an Asimov porn parody 😂 permalink fedilink source parent [–] brainrein@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago But if he did it to give the representatives the opportunity to read the bill they were about to vote on to make sure that they’re not being tricked by the Republicans — then he was supporting Congress permalink fedilink source parent [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago Hello anal I'm dad. More seriously, it seems like it'd be a pain to prove, since he has a (shitty) excuse. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago False alarms are against the law regardless of it being an attempt to fuck with Congress. Which is probably why an aid wouldn't do it for him. They knew they'd at least lose their job, and possibly get fined or have a few days in jail. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 9 points 2 years ago I for one LOVE that the not a lawyer acronym sounds like an Asimov porn parody 😂 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brainrein@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago But if he did it to give the representatives the opportunity to read the bill they were about to vote on to make sure that they’re not being tricked by the Republicans — then he was supporting Congress permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago Hello anal I'm dad. More seriously, it seems like it'd be a pain to prove, since he has a (shitty) excuse. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (2 children) In some jurisdictions, false reporting of emergencies is illegal. Not sure about DC or the halls of Congress. The proverbial false yelling of "fire" in crowded theater is literally one of the test examples for limitations that should be placed on free speech because it is so dangerous. Profoundly stupid. Your hapless opponents are creating all the bad press they can for you. How did he possibly think this would help? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 2 years ago Yelling fire in a crowded theater has been protected speech since the 60s The case was later partially overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio in 1969, which limited the scope of banned speech to that which would be directed to and likely to incite imminent lawless action (e.g. a riot).[1] permalink fedilink source parent [–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago* Okay so apparently he did it so the senate could actually read the bill they were signing as there was no time before the government shutdown so that adds interesting context at least. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 2 years ago Yelling fire in a crowded theater has been protected speech since the 60s The case was later partially overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio in 1969, which limited the scope of banned speech to that which would be directed to and likely to incite imminent lawless action (e.g. a riot).[1] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago* Okay so apparently he did it so the senate could actually read the bill they were signing as there was no time before the government shutdown so that adds interesting context at least. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Yeah I think he should probably get a stern talking to from a fire marshal and punished if he does it again permalink fedilink source parent