you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 14 points 2 years ago (4 children)

IANAL but didn't he obstruct Congress?

Wow I hate that acronym!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    False alarms are against the law regardless of it being an attempt to fuck with Congress. Which is probably why an aid wouldn't do it for him. They knew they'd at least lose their job, and possibly get fined or have a few days in jail.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    But if he did it to give the representatives the opportunity to read the bill they were about to vote on to make sure that they’re not being tricked by the Republicans — then he was supporting Congress

  • source
  • parent