▲ 1299 ▼ The Fediverse should do what redditors have always wanted and Reddit Inc. has always refused to do; Distinguish between NSFW and NSFL. (lemm.ee) submitted 2 years ago by Comment105@lemm.ee to c/meta@lemm.ee 151 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] favrion@lemm.ee 53 points 2 years ago (5 children) Not Safe for Work versus Not Safe for Life? permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] gavi@lemmynsfw.com 72 points 2 years ago (1 child) I think content warnings would be a better approach to this, all other fediverse software have content warnings anyway. Making community content to force use content warnings would be helpful too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dth@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago i agree, use of cw would be more useful because ’nsfw’ is just too vague and not specific enough. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Whisper06@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 years ago* Porn vs gore permalink fedilink source parent [–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 years ago Not safe for lemmy permalink fedilink source parent [–] Bebo@literature.cafe 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Lol even I thought it's not safe for life and was wondering what's that about permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fridgeratr@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Life is correct, NSFW is just something risqué or something that has bad language that you shouldn't look at at work, but NSFL is like gore or something disgusting or terrible that you shouldn't look at EVER, ANYWHERE unless you're desensitized lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Comment105@lemm.ee [S] 8 points 2 years ago NSFL can fuck with your head and might come back to haunt you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Bebo@literature.cafe 2 points 2 years ago OK thanks for the explanation. Now the difference between both makes sense to me. permalink fedilink source parent [+] zeekaran@sopuli.xyz -17 points 2 years ago (2 children) Not safe for looking. Gore, usually. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Subverb@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago (2 children) I've never once heard it called "Not Safe for Looking". Thats like a few years ago when my wife said she thought LOL was "Lots of Love". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Arfman@aussie.zone 0 points 2 years ago Just provide the alt tag permalink fedilink source parent [–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I could swear back in the 00s it started as Not Safe for Landing but I couldn't find anything to back that up when I checked permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Subverb@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Interesting. I've never heard that one either, but perhaps. These things evolve. permalink fedilink source parent [–] favrion@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago Al Gore? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gavi@lemmynsfw.com 72 points 2 years ago (1 child) I think content warnings would be a better approach to this, all other fediverse software have content warnings anyway. Making community content to force use content warnings would be helpful too. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] dth@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago i agree, use of cw would be more useful because ’nsfw’ is just too vague and not specific enough. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] dth@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago i agree, use of cw would be more useful because ’nsfw’ is just too vague and not specific enough. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bebo@literature.cafe 2 points 2 years ago (1 child) Lol even I thought it's not safe for life and was wondering what's that about permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Fridgeratr@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Life is correct, NSFW is just something risqué or something that has bad language that you shouldn't look at at work, but NSFL is like gore or something disgusting or terrible that you shouldn't look at EVER, ANYWHERE unless you're desensitized lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Comment105@lemm.ee [S] 8 points 2 years ago NSFL can fuck with your head and might come back to haunt you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Bebo@literature.cafe 2 points 2 years ago OK thanks for the explanation. Now the difference between both makes sense to me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fridgeratr@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (2 children) Life is correct, NSFW is just something risqué or something that has bad language that you shouldn't look at at work, but NSFL is like gore or something disgusting or terrible that you shouldn't look at EVER, ANYWHERE unless you're desensitized lol permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Comment105@lemm.ee [S] 8 points 2 years ago NSFL can fuck with your head and might come back to haunt you. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Bebo@literature.cafe 2 points 2 years ago OK thanks for the explanation. Now the difference between both makes sense to me. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Comment105@lemm.ee [S] 8 points 2 years ago NSFL can fuck with your head and might come back to haunt you. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Bebo@literature.cafe 2 points 2 years ago OK thanks for the explanation. Now the difference between both makes sense to me. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] zeekaran@sopuli.xyz -17 points 2 years ago (2 children) Not safe for looking. Gore, usually. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Subverb@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago (2 children) I've never once heard it called "Not Safe for Looking". Thats like a few years ago when my wife said she thought LOL was "Lots of Love". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Arfman@aussie.zone 0 points 2 years ago Just provide the alt tag permalink fedilink source parent [–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I could swear back in the 00s it started as Not Safe for Landing but I couldn't find anything to back that up when I checked permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Subverb@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Interesting. I've never heard that one either, but perhaps. These things evolve. permalink fedilink source parent [–] favrion@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago Al Gore? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago (2 children) I've never once heard it called "Not Safe for Looking". Thats like a few years ago when my wife said she thought LOL was "Lots of Love". permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Arfman@aussie.zone 0 points 2 years ago Just provide the alt tag permalink fedilink source parent [–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I could swear back in the 00s it started as Not Safe for Landing but I couldn't find anything to back that up when I checked permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Subverb@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Interesting. I've never heard that one either, but perhaps. These things evolve. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Arfman@aussie.zone 0 points 2 years ago Just provide the alt tag permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mr_Blott@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (1 child) I could swear back in the 00s it started as Not Safe for Landing but I couldn't find anything to back that up when I checked permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Subverb@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Interesting. I've never heard that one either, but perhaps. These things evolve. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago Interesting. I've never heard that one either, but perhaps. These things evolve. permalink fedilink source parent