Selfhosted

39238 readers

310 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.
No spam posting.
Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.
Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).
No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

PasswordManagement: which one of these options would you choose? (lemmy.wtf)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

107 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Objective: Secure & private password management, prevent anyone from stealing your passwords.

Option 1: Store Keepass PW file in personal cloud service like OneDrive/GoogleDrive/etc , download file, use KeepassXC to Open

Option 2: Use ProtonPass or similar solution like Bitwarden

Option 3: Host a solution like Vaultwarden

Which would do you choose? Are there more options ? Assume strong masterpassword and strong technical skills

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Vaultwarden behind mutual tls and reverse proxy and https://github.com/oguzhane/bitwarden-mobile until https://github.com/bitwarden/mobile/pull/2629 is merged

But honestly all services you mentioned are worthy.

Anything that fits your needs imao

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

That PR might be a while....
https://github.com/bitwarden/mobile/pull/2629#issuecomment-1731457466

Considering that android is going to prevent users from importing a CA

Edit:

Wait, I think I have my wires crossed.
I think android is removing the ability for apps to install certs.
The user has to manually install a cert, and then select it in the app

Edit again:
Yeh, this is what I was thinking of:
https://httptoolkit.com/blog/android-14-breaks-system-certificate-installation/

But, thinking about it now, I doubt it will actually affect the feature

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

"But, thinking about it now, I doubt it will actually affect the feature"

It will not

We don't need to import a custom CA authority here just to insatll a client cert

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Using let's encrypt is a lot easier to deal with on the client side than modifying CAs, although the initial set up of the server can be a pain in the ass if you're new to it.