152
Intel drops ‘i’ processor branding after 15 years, introduces ‘Ultra’ for higher-end chips (www.engadget.com)
submitted 3 years ago by to c/technology@beehaw.org
60 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 3 years ago (2 children)

That's exactly the point I'm trying to make. "i5" as an answer would've made sense, but "5" doesn't

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 7 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    I get it - I was just emphasizing it :P

    Was there a problem with the naming? I don't see why they'd change it given they've spent a long time building the brand.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago

    Ha okay. I wasn't quite sure whether you're emphasizing or did misunderstood me.

    Honestly I have no idea what the issue was with the old naming scheme. Didn't they just recently introduce an i9? Why not continue with an i11 etc instead of this Ultra nonsense.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent