The statue, outside the Brussels stock exchange, had just been restored at great cost.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 years ago

Although I'm only vaguely aware of the German laws, I don't think other EU nations' laws differ significantly.

Here's the corresponding law:

The insurer shall not be obligated to effect payment if the policyholder has intentionally and unlawfully caused the loss suffered by the third party.

Source:

Since this was clearly negligence, I think they would be fine. After all, they didn't intend to damage the statue. Gross negligence is still negligence.

  • source
  • parent