you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 8 points 6 hours ago

You might enjoy Davi Ottenheimer's take in GNU Maintainer: Slave-Made Code? “YES”.

Wollstonecraft answered the divisiveness claim even more clearly in 1790. Burke had argued that inherited institutions must stay beyond ethical examination, because a society that judges its own foundations fractures. Her reply applies to “fracture our community into many different enclaves” word for word: “the whole tenor of his plausible arguments settles slavery on an everlasting foundation.” In her second edition she spelled out the consequence. On Burke’s reasoning, “the slave trade ought never to be abolished.”

Sounds familiar, no?

A rule that forbids ethical examination of provenance protects whatever provenance is already inside the system. That held for sugar. It holds for emacs.

  • source
  • parent